Comparative Constitutional Reasoning
Anteprima |
Índice:
Introduction: Comparing constitutional reasoning with quantitative and
qualitative methods / András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre and Giulio Itzcovich
-- The High Court of Australia / Cheryl Saunders and Adrienne Stone --
The Austrian Constitutional Court / Konrad Lachmayer -- The Supreme
Federal Tribunal of Brazil / Conrado Hübner Mendes -- The Supreme Court
of Canada / Hugo Cyr and Monica Popescu -- The Constitutional Court of
the Czech Republic / Zdeněk Kühn -- The European Court of Human Rights /
Janneke Gerards -- The European Court of Justice / Giulio Itzcovich --
The French Constitutional Council / Arthur Dyevre -- The German Federal
Constitutional Court / Michaela Hailbronner and Stefan Martini -- The
Constitutional Court of Hungary / András Jakab and Johanna Frölich --
The Supreme Court of Ireland / Eoin Carolan -- The Israeli Supreme Court
/ Suzie Navot -- The Constitutional Court of Italy / Tania Groppi and
Irene Spigno -- The Constitutional Court of South Africa / Christa
Rautenbach and Lourens du Plessis -- The Spanish Constitutional Court /
Marian Ahumada Ruiz -- The Constitutional Court of Taiwan / Wen-Chen
Chang -- The Supreme Court (House of Lords) of the United Kingdom /
Tamas Gyorfi -- The Supreme Court of the United States / Howard Schweber
and Jennifer L. Brookhart -- Conclusion / András Jakab, Arthur Dyevre
and Giulio Itzcovich.