The Democratic Dilemma: Reforming the Canadian Senate
Jennifer Smith - Institute of Intergovernmental Relations, School of Policy Studies, Queen's University, 2009               
 In
 2006 Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government introduced
 two bills to reform the Senate: one to establish limited terms for 
senators, replacing the existing system of appointment until age 75 and 
the other to establish consultative elections for the Senate with the 
prime minister nominating the winners of the election. Both bills have 
been heard in the House of Commons and the Senate but neither bill has 
been enacted into law. The government's initiatives are proving 
controversial for two reasons. One is the contents of the bills. The 
other is procedural and concerns the federal government's strategy of 
treating Senate reform as a matter for Parliament alone to determine - a
 matter of federal legislation rather than an amendment of the 
constitution. Contributors examine all angles of the debate on Senate 
reform. They address the constitutionality of the proposals and bring to
 light features of the bills that have not yet been analyzed, assessing 
their significance for the conduct of a reformed chamber. They consider 
whether the objectives of the reformers are likely to be met by these 
proposals or whether the result will have unintended consequences. They 
demonstrate how complicated Senate reform is, full of unexpected twists 
and turns, and show that successful reform requires a deep understanding
 of the country's parliamentary system and culture and a delicate 
approach to institutional change.Contributorsinclude Jane Ajzenstat 
(McMaster University), Peter Aucoin (Dalhousie University), Louise 
Carbert (Dalhousie University), Don Desserud (University of New 
Brunswick in Saint John), Andrew Heard (Simon Fraser University), Tom 
Kent (Institute for Research on Public Policy and Queen's University), 
Stephen Michael MacLean (independent scholar), Lorna Marsden (York 
University), Vincent Pouliot (lawyer and entrepreneur, Quebec), Hugh 
Segal (Senate of Canada), David Smith (University of Regina), Nadia 
Verrelli (Queen's University), Ron Watts (Queen's University), and John 
Whyte (University of Saskatchewan).
In
 2006 Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservative government introduced
 two bills to reform the Senate: one to establish limited terms for 
senators, replacing the existing system of appointment until age 75 and 
the other to establish consultative elections for the Senate with the 
prime minister nominating the winners of the election. Both bills have 
been heard in the House of Commons and the Senate but neither bill has 
been enacted into law. The government's initiatives are proving 
controversial for two reasons. One is the contents of the bills. The 
other is procedural and concerns the federal government's strategy of 
treating Senate reform as a matter for Parliament alone to determine - a
 matter of federal legislation rather than an amendment of the 
constitution. Contributors examine all angles of the debate on Senate 
reform. They address the constitutionality of the proposals and bring to
 light features of the bills that have not yet been analyzed, assessing 
their significance for the conduct of a reformed chamber. They consider 
whether the objectives of the reformers are likely to be met by these 
proposals or whether the result will have unintended consequences. They 
demonstrate how complicated Senate reform is, full of unexpected twists 
and turns, and show that successful reform requires a deep understanding
 of the country's parliamentary system and culture and a delicate 
approach to institutional change.Contributorsinclude Jane Ajzenstat 
(McMaster University), Peter Aucoin (Dalhousie University), Louise 
Carbert (Dalhousie University), Don Desserud (University of New 
Brunswick in Saint John), Andrew Heard (Simon Fraser University), Tom 
Kent (Institute for Research on Public Policy and Queen's University), 
Stephen Michael MacLean (independent scholar), Lorna Marsden (York 
University), Vincent Pouliot (lawyer and entrepreneur, Quebec), Hugh 
Segal (Senate of Canada), David Smith (University of Regina), Nadia 
Verrelli (Queen's University), Ron Watts (Queen's University), and John 
Whyte (University of Saskatchewan). 
