by John Medearis
Is infrequent voting the most we can expect from a
free citizenry? Would democracy be more robust if our political discourse were
more deliberative? John Medearis’s trenchant and trend-bucking work of
political philosophy argues that democracies face significant challenges that
go beyond civic lethargy and unreasonable debate. Democracy is inherently a
fragile state of affairs, he reminds us. Revisiting fundamental questions about
the system in theory and practice, Why Democracy Is Oppositional helps us see
why preserving democracy has always been―and will always be―a struggle.
As citizens of democracies seek political control over
their destinies, they confront forces that threaten to dominate their lives.
These forces may take the form of runaway financial markets, powerful special
interests, expanding militaries, or dysfunctional legislatures. But citizens of
democracies help create the very institutions that overwhelm them. Hostile
threats do not generally come from the outside but are the product of citizens’
own collective activities. Medearis contends that democratic action perpetually
arises to reclaim egalitarian control over social forces and institutions that
have become alienated from large numbers of citizens. Democracy is therefore
necessarily oppositional. Concerted, contentious political activities of all
kinds are fundamental to it, while consensus and easy compromise are rarities.
Recovering insights from political theorists such as
Karl Marx and John Dewey, Why Democracy Is Oppositional addresses contemporary
issues ranging from the global financial crisis and economic inequality to
drone warfare and mass incarceration.