by Eric Posner
In International Human Rights, acclaimed legal scholar
Eric Posner seeks to explain a paradox: the language of human rights is now the
dominant mode of international moral criticism of governments, and yet the
evidence suggests that most countries flagrantly violate the human rights
treaties that they solemnly ratify. The prevailing consensus, he notes, is that
governments should promote the well-being of citizens in their countries, and
that in extreme cases, foreign countries should intervene and replace
governments that fail to comply with this duty. The problem, he contends, is
countries disagree on how they can achieve those goals. This weakness is on
full display in existing human rights treaties, and the result is a general
failure. Because countries have not been able to agree about 'well-being,' they
ended up negotiating treaties that are vague and (by design) unenforceable. In
addition, countries have ensured that international organizations possess weak
enforcement powers. Moreover, when enforcement does occur, it is invariably
partial and scattershot. In whack-a-mole style, target countries can compensate
for addressing some violations by reducing their compliance with other norms
that are not the focus of enforcement. Posner closes by arguing that foreign
aid provides a better model for pressuring governments to improve their
treatment of citizens. Under the foreign aid regime, western countries look at
overall indicators of well-being in other countries—such as per capita GDP—and
offer aid based on whether it is likely to help people escape poverty.
Governments that make progress in reducing poverty should be deemed in
compliance with their human rights obligations, and we should not waste time
trying to enforce more specific rights like freedom of the press or the right
to privacy.
In addition to offering a powerful and provocative
thesis, this is a concise introduction to international human rights law.
Posner describes the major treaties and the major international organizations;
the evidence regarding the effect of human rights treaties on the behavior of
governments; and recent international controversies over human rights such as
the United States' use of torture, China's persecution of political dissidents,
and the debate over the alleged right against defamation of religion.