History, Theory, Continuity
Stephen Skinner
Fascism was one of the twentieth century's principal
political forces, and one of the most violent and problematic. Brutal,
repressive and in some cases totalitarian, the fascist and authoritarian
regimes of the early twentieth century, in Europe and beyond, sought to create
revolutionary new orders that crushed their opponents. A central component of
such regimes' exertion of control was criminal law, a focal point and key instrument
of State punitive and repressive power. This collection brings together a range
of original essays by international experts in the field to explore questions
of criminal law under Italian Fascism and other similar regimes, including
Franco's Spain, Vargas's Brazil and interwar Romania and Japan. Addressing
issues of substantive criminal law, criminology and ideology, the form and
function of criminal justice institutions, and the role and perception of
criminal law in processes of transition, the collection casts new light on
fascism's criminal legal history and related questions of theoretical
interpretation and historiography. At the heart of the collection is the
problematic issue of continuity and similarity among fascist systems and
preceding, contemporaneous and subsequent legal orders, an issue that goes to
the heart of fascist regimes' historical identity and the complex relationship
between them and the legal orders constructed in their aftermath. The
collection thus makes an innovative contribution both to the comparative
understanding of fascism, and to critical engagement with the foundations and
modalities of criminal law across systems.