Le operazioni di peacekeeping delle organizzazioni regionali
Giovanni Cellamare - Cacucci, 2015
L'art.
62 dello Statuto della Corte internazionale di giustizia consente allo
Stato terzo di intervenire in un giudizio tra due Stati, laddove esso
abbia un interesse giuridico suscettibile di essere pregiudicato dalla
futura sentenza. A partire dal 1990, la giurisprudenza della Corte ha
ammesso la legittimità , ai sensi dell¿art. 62, dell'intervento 'come
non parte', consentendo così allo Stato terzo di partecipare al
contraddittorio per tutelare il proprio interesse giuridico, anche in
assenza di un apposito titolo di giurisdizione e senza proporre alcuna
domanda nei confronti delle parti originarie. Se questa figura
costituisce ormai ius receptum nel sistema della Corte, la prassi rivela
ancora molte incertezze nella sua applicazione. Il presente studio
intende contribuire alla ricostruzione dei suoi caratteri strutturali.
Dopo una prima parte in cui viene inquadrata la posizione dello Stato
terzo assente dal processo (limiti del giudicato, pregiudizio fattuale
derivante dalla sentenza per lo Stato terzo, regola della parte
necessaria), la seconda parte si sofferma sulla genesi della figura
dell¿intervento come non parte, sul suo oggetto e sui suoi effetti per
lo Stato terzo e le parti originarie, nonché sui criteri seguiti dalla
Corte per la sua autorizzazione. L¿indagine viene condotta anche con
riferimento alla figura dell¿intervento ai sensi dell'art. 63 (norma che
autorizza gli Stati parte a una convenzione multilaterale a intervenire
in ogni giudizio in cui si discuta della sua interpretazione), alla
quale viene riconosciuto fondamentale valore ricostruttivo.
La prassi successiva e l'interpretazione del diritto internazionale scritto
I tribunali penali internazionalizzati. Fondamento, giurisdizione e diritto applicabile![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
Legal
Thought and Philosophy clarifies background questions in legal research
projects, such as the relationship between law and justice, law and
politics, law and knowledge, facts and norms, normativity and validity,
constituent and constitutional power, and rule and context. It provides
advanced students in law and philosophy with an account of legal
thinking that combines analytical and phenomenological insights. From a
conception of justice as principled political self-restraint, the book
explains why there are moral reasons to separate law from morality
conceptually and in what sense a legal order is positive - that is, set
by authority and bound up with history. The book explores the conditions
under which law may become an object of knowledge and theorising,
before finally discussing how these features come together in law as
rule-following by citizens, officials, judges, and legislators
alike.Addressing advanced students in law and philosophy, this key book:
* bridges separate traditions in legal philosophy (in particular
analytical philosophy and phenomenology)* develops a view of law as an
institution of authority from a conception of justice in the
socio-political relationship between 'we' and 'the others'* presents a
systematic account of normativity and validity* explains in what sense
law is 'doing things with rules'.![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() | ||
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Look inside |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
Migration
and Freedom is a thorough and revealing exploration of the complex
relationship between mobility and citizenship in Europe. Brad Blitz
draws upon European and international law, political theory, economics,
history and contemporary studies of migration to provide an original
account of the opportunities and challenges associated with the right to
free movement in Europe and beyond. Integrating over 160 interviews
with individuals in Croatia, Slovenia, Italy, Spain, the UK and Russia,
this book provides a unique focus on both internal and inter-state
mobility and a re-evaluation of the concept of freedom of movement. The
author documents successful and unsuccessful settlement and
establishment cases and records how both official and informal
restrictions on individuals' mobility have effectively created new
categories of citizenship and exclusion within Europe.This book is an
original study aimed at academics, students and government officials
interested in migration, international studies, public and social
policy, and politics.![]() |
| Anteprima |
This timely book explores the complexities of the rule of law - a
well-used but perhaps less well understood term - to explain why it is
so often appealed to in discussions of global politics. Ranging from
capacity building and the role of the World Bank to the discourse(s) of
lawyers and jurisprudential critiques, it seeks to introduce non-lawyers
to the important and complex political economy of the rule of law. In
accessible terms, Christopher May argues that we can no longer merely
use the idea of the rule of law without question but rather must
appreciate its multifaceted and contested character if we are to begin
to understand how and why it is now seen as a `good thing' across the
political spectrum. He expertly examines the problems encountered by
rule of law programmes in post-conflict and developing countries, as
well as presenting the range of contested meanings of the term. The
author also considers the possibility of establishing a pluralistic
account of the rule of law and investigates the plausibility of an
international rule of law. By building on and extending debates in
socio-legal studies about the social role of law, and dealing with
issues largely absent from international political economy this book
will be of great interest to socio - legal scholars and political
economists. It also presents an overarching analysis of the manner in
which politics and law interact that will be of great value to political
scientists and development economists.![]() |
| Anteprima |
![]() |
| Anteprima |
a cura di
Andrea Bianchi - Elgar, 2017